Summary
At the conclusion of a rather disorganized meeting, the Design Commission
voted to recommend the City Council NOT accept the
design as it was presented. This was based on a
combination of factors over which the Design Commission is not
supposedly responsible (suitablility of site for the purpose) as well
as building design preferences (have building height step down with
site slope instead of a single roof line with stepping down base, sign,
entryway), and a lack of details provided about building materials
and landscaping.
Details
and commentary on
meeting.
Supporting Materials made available at
the hearing
Staff
Report for
the hearing.
The following Drawings are all by the city contracted
the albert group architects and are
annotated as follows: "The drawings and specifications and ideas,
designs and arrangements represented thereby are and shall remain the
property of the architect and no part thereof shall be copied disclosed
to others or used connection with any other work or project other than
the specific project for which they have been prepared and developed,
without the written consent of the architect. Visual contact with
these drawings or specifications shall constitute conclusive evidence
of acceptance of these restrictions."
Drawing A0.01 - Area site plan (site,
access route, and surroundings)
Drawing A1.00 - Site Plan (project layout from above)
Drawing
A1.01 - Topography
Drawing A2.01 - Roof Plan
Drawing A2.01 - Conceptual Section (project cross section from south)
Drawing A3.00 -
Exterior Elevation conceptual drawings of North and South building faces
Drawing A3.00 -
Exterior Elevation conceptual drawings of East and West building faces
Drawing A4.00 -
South to North Building Section
Drawing A4.00 -
East to West Building Section
Drawing L1.0 -
Landscape Plan
Drawing A0.0 -
Exterior Elevation conceptual drawing of center portion of East
building face